Among the various types of report that exist, we have event reports, these are characterized by not having any foundation or alternative basis that endorse or sustain them, but that what is stated in them is supported only by the word of the person who writes it, In other words, they lack other types of support as in the case of other types of reports, in which there are attached documents that accompany them, so that in an event report, its credibility is basically based on the honorability and the word of the that makes the document.
This particular type of report is common in areas such as those made by some military, police and judicial authorities, and these documents may or may not be made internally or externally to the institution to which they belong.
Example of a police event report:
Cusco, Peru, July 12, 2017
EVENT REPORT
Secretariat of Public Security of Cusco
Deoartamento of Cusco
Avenida Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla # 89230
I hereby inform you of the events that occurred on January 23, 2017, on Calle Norte 9, Colonia Aguamarina, in this city of Cusco.
On November 23 of the present day, at approximately 11:43 PM, two women, one of approximately 27 years old and the other of approximately 38 years old, appeared to the patrol No. 6454 under my charge, mentioning that between the streets of Lake Michigan and Lake Victoria, had suffered a verbal aggression by several subjects, an aggression that was responded to by his companion, a male individual of approximately 33 years of age, who was attacked by at least seven of said subjects when defending the two women of the verbal aggressions carried out by the aforementioned subjects, leading to a fight between the companion of the two women and the at least seven subjects, for which the two women were forced to shout for help,To which, when I realized during my patrol tour and when I was called by both women, I approached the scene of the events, confirming that several drunken subjects and under the influence of prohibited substances (drugs), were struggling with the person who had helped both women and by not obeying my order to stop, I was forced to make use of my charge weapon, first firing into the air and later injuring one of the assailants in the foot, after which the rest of the assailants they withdrew from the scene, leaving only the wounded aggressor, the two women and their male companion, who were taken to the public prosecutor’s office to present their statement.They struggled with the person who had helped both women and by not obeying my order to stop, I was forced to use my charge weapon, first shooting into the air and later injuring one of the aggressors in the foot, after which the rest of the aggressors withdrew from the place, remaining only the wounded aggressor, the two women and their male companion, who were taken to the public prosecutor’s office to present their statement.They struggled with the person who had helped both women and by not obeying my order to stop, I was forced to use my charge weapon, first shooting into the air and later injuring one of the aggressors in the foot, after which the rest of the aggressors withdrew from the place, remaining only the wounded aggressor, the two women and their male companion, who were taken to the public prosecutor’s office to present their statement.the two women and their male companion, who were taken to the public prosecutor’s office to present their statement.the two women and their male companion, who were taken to the public prosecutor’s office to present their statement.
The wounded aggressor was transferred under custody to a hospital to be treated and later be disposed of before the corresponding authority.
Commander Roberto Martínez Güero
(Signature)
Municipal Police
Business event report example:
EVENT REPORT
Investigative commission
Through this report, the board of directors of the Banca Progresa bank is informed of the results of the investigations concerning the persons:
- Accountant (Juan Zepeda Rodríguez)
- Cashier (Pedro Moreno Salinas)
That their functions function in branch number 3 of this financial institution, a report that was requested last Friday, July 7 of this year, due to the alleged diversion of capital by any of these officials who work in said branch belonging to this institution.
After the initiation of the investigations, it has been possible to detect several irregularities in various transactions, detecting several withdrawals of balance by the same person in more than 30 bank accounts that are in the name of a similar number names of people who once had an account savings in this bank and that currently no longer exist (due to the death of the account holder), in the case of a crime of usurpation of identity of said deceased account holders, so that the accountant Juan Zepeda Rodríguez would pass funds to said accounts, pretending that those funds belonged to the persons named there as account holders, said funds being withdrawn in cash by the cashier Pedro Moreno Salinas, in complicity with a third person posing as the fictitious account holders,before the branch staff and the branch surveillance cameras presenting false documentation of the bank accounts provided by the accountant Juan Zepeda Rodríguez, simulating that said withdrawals were made by the holders of the apocryphal accounts always in box 2 by part of the Pedro Moreno Salinas ATM, subtracting in this way for at least 8 months, several thousand pesos per month adding an average of about 45 thousand pesos on a monthly basis, even embezzling the bank for an amount of around 400,000 pesos (until now accounted for ).simulating that these withdrawals were made by the holders of the apocryphal accounts always in box 2 by the cashier Pedro Moreno Salinas, thus subtracting several thousand pesos per month for at least 8 months, adding an average of about 45 thousand pesos monthly, embezzling the bank for an amount of around 400,000 pesos (so far accounted for).simulating that these withdrawals were made by the holders of the apocryphal accounts always in box 2 by the cashier Pedro Moreno Salinas, thus subtracting several thousand pesos per month for at least 8 months, adding an average of about 45 thousand pesos monthly, embezzling the bank for an amount of around 400,000 pesos (so far accounted for).
These movements were made every month by the accountant Juan Zepeda Rodríguez and the cashier Pedro Moreno Salinas, withdrawing only between 2,800 and 3,500 pesos per account, so that these capital outflows are not noticed or detected by the other cashiers, accountants , administrator and other personnel of the branch, withdrawing said funds in cash, through the third person who helped them to subtract the cash, thus perpetrating the embezzlement.
We were able to verify these irregular movements after analyzing the documentation of the alleged account holders on behalf of which the person who posed as such persons charged monthly in complicity with the accountant and the cashier of the branch no.3 of BancaProgresa located at Sadi Carnot 75 , San Rafael, 06470 Mexico City, CDMX.
For the verifications corresponding to this matter, in due course I will send to the board of directors of this banking institution, copies and originals of the apocryphal documents with which these officials and another person committed the embezzlement of this institution.
