10 Examples of Universal Judgments

Universal judgments are those that refer to all the facts or beings covered by the extension of the concept. Referring to general causes in the field of Law, they are those where the entire patrimony of a person can be affected, including its assets and liabilities.

What are the 10 examples of universal judgments?

1. affirmative

As to what are common opinions in logic , it renders a verdict in which the subject of the sentence agrees or is compatible with the given statement.

Example: Fish live in water.

2. Bankruptcy

Said procedure occurs when a natural or legal person goes through an insolvency situation, in which they cannot face all their debts.

3. undefined

As to what a global insight is in philosophy , inclusion is unclear, since it denies the probability that the individual is embodied outside of the predicate .

Example: I don’t know whether to start the diet today or do it next week.

4. Negative

Regarding the usual negative appreciation models , they imply the tacit presence of quantifiers, in this case it would be none.

Example: No cow can fly.

5. By preventive tender

Indicates the presumption of insolvency by the debtor, so that debts can be renegotiated, preventing bankruptcy.

6. By petition of bankruptcy

It is a process that can be requested by the creditor or the debtor, through the cessation of payment of debts.

7. Succession intestate or without will

In this case, a deceased person did not leave a valid will. Therefore, those who consider they have some right over the inheritance , must go before a judge.

8. Estate presumed vacant

For its part, this type of trial consists of a process in which there are apparently no successors. The police authority and the state prosecutor’s office are involved.

9. Probate of probate of testament

Through a notary, the document is validated to later be taken as a will.

10. Probate succession

As its name implies, it shows that the person’s will has been established in a will.

The will is a legal instrument that designates to whom you grant your property and rights.

Characteristics of this type of trial according to bankruptcy processes

Within bankruptcy processes, the principle of universality can be strongly affected, including past, present and future legal ties. It transcends the patrimony to the universality of creditors.

The totality of the assets is affected by the process, and it is evident that the bankruptcy process is the ideal means to influence the sphere of substantive law.

In other words, the consequences of the embargo become universal, affecting pending legal relationships and encompassing future situations.

Consequently, this requires a complex regulation that also involves the performance of an administrative activity. In short, the examples of universal judgments affect the principle of universality.

In this sense, while such a principle works thanks to the recognition of some human rights , the exposure of the total patrimony of individuals can compromise them.

Other peculiarities of these causes according to the Law

It should be noted that there are various mechanisms to ensure access to certain rights, which ensure access to specific rights, beyond the full exposure of the assets.

Let us remember that, par excellence, general disputes are bankruptcies (commercial lawsuits) and successions (civil lawsuits).

In any of the cases, the purpose is to reliably specify who are the ones who have the right to get all the assets of a person (physical or legal).

Obviously, whoever previously owned the assets will not have them again. When dealing with bankruptcies, the figure of the creditor arises and in the case of successions, that of the deceased.

In such a way that, the process remains as follows: the possessions of the person are exposed to the sanction. Thus, it can go to a forced execution of the debtor’s obligations.

Traits according to philosophy

According to this science, the affirmative universal judgment includes “Everything” as a quantifier, while its opposite, the negative universal, has “None” or “none” as quantifiers.

There is also the particular affirmative opinion, whose quantifier is “some” and if we refer to the particular Negative, “Some” is also present accompanied by “is not”.

For his part, the philosopher Pedro Hispano identifies the affirmative universal judgments by means of the vowels present in the Latin word “affirmo”, leaving in this way:

  • Universal Affirmative: A.

While, for negative universals, it takes into account the vowels of the word “negó”, resulting in Universal Negative: E.

Final note

By bankruptcy, forced execution occurs in the particular case that the debtor does not execute the assignment of all his obligations by his own means.