A Brief History of English Plays Before Shakespeare

 A Brief History of English Plays Before Shakespeare

Miracle or Mystery Plays

The history of English Plays before Shakespeare drama dates from the eleventh century. The earliest dramatic representation in England is believed to have been the performance of a Latin play in honor of St. Katharine, at Duns table in 1110) By the time of the Roman conquest (1066),  from of religious drama, originating from the rich symbolic ceremonial of the Church had already established itself in France, and as a matter of course it soon found its way into England. Its purpose was directly didactic or instructional; it was the work of priests who used it as the means of conveying the truths of their religion to the illiterate masses. To begin with, the Church had this drama completely under control; performances were given inside the church buildings themselves; the priests were the actors; and Latin was the language employed. This form of drama was known as the Miracle or Mystery play. The material for mystery plays was drawn from the Bible and these mystery plays expanded the mysteries connected with religion. Miracles consisted of the stories of saints in whose honor they were acted. As the mystery or miracle plays increased in popularity and on great occasions larger and larger crowds came to witness the performances, it became necessary to remove the stage from the interior of the building to the porch. Laymen at the same time began to take part in the performances, and soon they superseded the priests entirely. Also, the vernacular tongue, first French, then English, took the place of Latin.

The Four Great Cycles of Mystery Plays

This religious drama in England reached its height in the 14th century, from which time onward at the festival of Corpus Christi in early summer, miracle plays were represented in nearly all large English towns in great connected sequences or cycles. These Corpus Christi plays were also known as “collective mysteries” and they exhibited the whole story of the fall of man and of man’s redemption. Their performances were arranged by the trading guilds “”of different towns. Four of these cycles have come down to us complete: (I) The Chester Cycle of 25 plays (2) The Coventry Cycle of 42 plays (3) The Wakefield Cycle of 31 plays (4) The York Cycle of 48 plays. Each of these begins with the creation of the world and the fall of man and, after dealing with such prophetic themes as the Flood, the sacrifice of Isaac, and the exodus from Egypt, goes on to represent the last scenes in the life of Christ—the Crucifixion . Resurrection, and Ascension— and closes with the Last Judgment. *In literary quality these plays are of course crude but here and there they touch the note of pathos and the note of tragedy, while the occasional introduction of a comic element shows even more clearly the growth of a dramatic sense. These religious performances lasted well on into the 16th century and there is good reason to think that Shakespeare must have witnessed one at least of those which, during his boyhood, were still being given at Coventry. (Hamlet’s advice to the players not to “out- Herod Herod” recalls the declamatory and rhetorical style of the Herod of the old miracle plays).

Morality Plays

The next stage in the history of English drama is the morality play. This, like the miracle play, was didactic in purpose; but it’s* characters, instead of being taken from the Bible or from the legends of the saints, were personified abstractions. All kinds of mental and moral qualities appeared on the stage as characters in the play— Perseverance  Free Will, the Five Senses, the Seven Deadly Sins, good and bad Angels, etc. Among such personifications, there was generally a place for the Devil who had held a prominent position in the miracle plays. A later introduction of much importance was the so-called Vice, who was a humorous personification of evil taken on the comic side. This was the recognized fun-maker of the piece. This character often scored a tremendous popular success by jumping on the Devil’s back, sticking thorns into him, beating him with a stick, and making him roar with pain He is especially interesting as the direct fore-runner of the clown of the Elizabethan stage.

You Must know the facts About English Plays Before Shakespeare

The Interlude

The interlude was a late product of the dramatic development of the morality play. The interlude was a short dramatic piece of a satiric rather than of a religious or ethical nature, in tone and purpose far less serious than the morality proper. This form grew up early in the 16th century and is rather closely associated with the name of John Heywood (1497-1580), who for a time was court musician and general provider of entertainment to Henry VIII.His Four P, a dialogue in which a Palmer, a Pardoner, a Pothecary. And a Pedlar exchange racy stories and finally enters into competition as to which of them can tell the biggest lie, is the most amusing specimen of its class. The interludes were often acted by household servants or retainers and are important as developing the custom of a nobleman of wealth having a band of more or less well-trained actors dependent, on him. In the latter part of Elizabeth’s reign, when the drama proper” was full-grown, we find theatrical companies calling themselves “the Earl of Leicester’s Servants’*, the “Queen’s Players”, and so on.

The Beginnings of Regular Comedy and Tragedy

These early experiments in play-writing are of great importance historically, because they did much to prepare the way for the regular drama. It was, however, under the direct influence of the Renaissance (i.e., the revival of learning) that the English comedy and tragedy alike passed out of these preliminary phases of their development into forms of art. Men went back to the classics for inspiration and example in the drama as in all other fields of literary enterprise, though it was the work of the Latin, not of the Greek, playwrights that they took as their models. At first the comedies of Plautus and Terence, and the tragedies of Seneca were themselves acted at the universities, and on special occasions elsewhere. Then came Latin imitations, and in due course these were followed by attempts to. Fashion English plays upon the pattern of the originals. In such attempts English writers learned many valuable lessons in the princi­ples of dramatic construction and technique. The first real English comedy, Roister Doister, was written in 1550 by Nicholas Udall, Read-master of Eton, for performance by his school-boys. It has five acts in the Latin style and deals in an entertaining manner with the wooing of Dame Custance by the vainglorious hero, his various mis­adventures, and the pranks of Matthew Merry Greek, the jester.Though greatly indebted to Plautus and Terence, it shows the influence of the older humours of the miracle plays and the moralities. The first real English tragedy, Gorboduc, reproduces the form and spirit of Senecan tragedy. It was written by Thomas Sackville and Thomas Norton in 1561 for representation before the members of the Inner Temple at their Christmas festivities. This first English tragedy was the first English play to use blank verse which had been introduced into English poetry only a few years before.

Shakespeare’s Predecessors

The quarter century or so which followed the production of Gorbuduc was a period of vast experimentation in the English drama. There was a conflict between those who insisted on the classical tradition and those who wanted to cater to the strong national taste of the English public. In the end, the national taste won, and just before Shakespeare began his career as a playwright the romantic form of drama as distinguished from the classical type) was definitely established. The establishment of this romantic drama was the achievement of Shakespeare’s immediate predecessors, a group of scholars commonly known as the “university wits”.They include John Lyly, Thomas Kyd, George Peele, Thomas Lodge, Robert” Greene, Christopher Marlowe, and Thomas Nash. Of these John Lyly (1554-1606) and Christopher Marlowe (1564-93) possess a special significance, and they exerted a direct influence upon Shakespeare.

JOHN LYLY

John Lyly’s dramatic work consists of eight comedies, of which the best are Compaspe, Endymion, and Gallanthea. Their interest depends not on plot or characterization but on language, wit, in­genuity, and grace of the dialogue. Lyly helped to give comedy an intellectual tone. In his skill in repartee, puns, conceits, and all sorts of verbal fire-works, he anticipated Shakespeare, whose early comes dies, such as Love’s Labor’s Lost and A Midsummer Night’s Dream, we much to his example. In comedy, John Lyly was undeniably Shakespeare’s first master.

MARLOWE

Marlowe’s historical importance is even greater. A man of fiery imagination and immense powers, he lived a wild Bohemian life. While still young he was killed in a drunken fight. His Tamburlaine he Great, Dr. Faustus, The Jew of Malta, and Edward II, despite their bombast and extravagance, fix the type of tragedy and chronicle Play for his immediate successors. He used blank verse in these plays nth great success. In fact, before Marlowe there was neither genuine blank verse nor a genuine tragedy in the English language. Marlowe created the modern English drama. After his arrival the way was prepared and the paths were made straight for Shakespeare. Shakespeare early blank verse is fashioned on Marlowe’s. Shakespeare’s narrative poem, Venus and Adonis, is to some extent inspired by Marlowe’s Hero and Leander. Shakespeare’s Richard III and Richard Tare clearly based on the model of chronicle play provided in Marlowe’s Edward II. Even Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice owes something to Marlowe’s The Jew of Melt.


 

 

Leave a Comment